Spiritual Disciplines

Introduction

There are certain teachers who focus a lot on spiritual disciplines that I want to address. The movement they are part of has been called the Emergent Church or the contemplative prayer movement. A common theme in their teaching is a focus on less important or even unbiblical practices/ideas along with a severe downplaying of biblical truths. The result is turning Christianity into a self-help program or mystical experience rather than faith grounded in the saving work of Christ unto the glory of God.

I don't know enough about each individual, so I don't want to make a blanket statement that every individual I address here is a heretic. However, I do see a problem with the direction, focus, and content of much of this movement, so I want to bring the Bible to bear on this topic.

To understand where this movement stands, it's helpful to consider influences and parallels. Much of what is taught is drawn from Roman Catholic mysticism. There is a clear New Age bent with a focus on feelings, meditation, and the subjective experience with a rejection of the importance of theology, which is very Eastern (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism, Eastern Orthodoxy). It has a very humanistic view of the self, a pelagian model of human failure, and an Arminian view of salvation (with universalistic tendencies). There are clear connections to Mormon and Quaker theology which teach an inner light or feeling to confirm their ideas.

Resources

I want to provide some helpful resources that I'm drawing from up front:

John Comer: A big influence in the evangelical world. Why Christians Should Avoid John Mark Comer by Servantofgrace (YouTube) is a good starting point where Marcia Montenegro goes over much of her article John Mark Comer's Practicing The Way or Practicing a Way? An Evaluation. The article includes historical background and influences which touch on many of the figures that follow.

Dallas Willard: He was a big influence on John Comer. The Dangers of Spiritual Formation and Spiritual Disciplines: A Critique of Dallas Willard and The Spirit of the Disciplines by Bob DeWaay. Dallas Willard: An Emergent Conspirator and Debunking Dallas Willard and Being Worthy to be Saved by Ken Silva.

Richard Foster: He worked hand in hand with Dallas Willard. Richard Foster—Celebration of Deception by Bob DeWaay. A Serious Look at Richard Foster's "School" of Contemplative Prayer by Lighthouse Trails author.

Cooperating with God's Grace

The relationship between sanctification, grace, and Scripture is often misunderstood, particularly when teachings emphasize a cooperative effort where God does His part and we do ours. This misconception places undue focus on spiritual disciplines as the primary driver of spiritual growth, suggesting that our efforts play a central role.

Sanctification is fundamentally the work of God through the Holy Spirit, as Philippians 2:13 reminds us: "For it is God who works in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure." The danger of overemphasizing human effort is that it risks divorcing sanctification from God's grace and the transforming power of the Holy Spirit, leading to a works-based understanding that diminishes God's role in the process.

Personal Experience

Another significant concern is the overreliance on personal experience or "Christian teaching" that is not grounded in Scripture. Some teachers claim biblical authority without proper engagement with the text, substituting subjective experience or esoteric ideas for sound exegesis. This approach elevates feelings and experiences above the revealed truth of God's Word.

The sufficiency of Scripture is undermined when theology is neglected, and personal interpretation takes precedence. The result is a shallow understanding of faith, where the pursuit of intimacy with God becomes an emotional or mystical endeavor detached from biblical foundations. Scripture clearly warns against such tendencies, emphasizing that sanctification comes through truth: "Sanctify them in the truth; your word is truth" (Jn 17:17).

This mysticism often manifests in teaching, either explicitly or implicitly, that Scripture, prayer, and fellowship are insufficient for intimacy with God. Instead, it promotes spiritual disciplines as a way to access deeper knowledge or experiences. Such approaches resemble Gnostic ideas, where hidden knowledge or special experiences are prioritized over revealed truth.

Sanctification

Ephesians 2:8-9 emphasizes that salvation and sanctification are gifts of grace, not a result of works, so that no one may boast. Romans 3:23-26 reminds us that justification and sanctification are the result of God's work through Christ, not our own efforts. Similarly, Romans 6:22 describes sanctification as the fruit of being set free from sin and becoming slaves to God, leading to eternal life. These truths highlight the centrality of God's work in sanctification, leaving no room for self-reliance or the pursuit of mystical experiences as a means to spiritual maturity.

While disciplines like prayer and meditation, when properly understood, are used by God to grow believers, they are not substitutes for the transformative power of God's Word and Spirit. We must constantly look to and rely on God for every good thing.

Theology

A key danger in these teachings is their detachment of discipleship from sound theology. Discipleship without theological grounding leads to a directionless pursuit of spiritual growth, often driven by feelings rather than truth. Theology provides the reason and direction for following Christ, shaping the way we pray, serve, and grow spiritually. Paul's letters consistently begin with theological truths which then inform Christian living. Without a strong theological foundation, Christians risk being led astray, mistaking emotional highs for spiritual maturity. True growth glorifies God when it is rooted in His Word and shaped by sound doctrine.

Presentation

Another troubling aspect of these teachings is the way they are presented. They are often delivered in a soft, appealing tone. You're told to write things down as if they were profound. A lot of times they give a loose paraphrase of Scripture which gives the illusion of biblical grounding. This disarms listeners, making them less critical of what is being taught. However, the teachings often mischaracterize opposing positions, rely on emotional appeals, and lack serious engagement with Scripture. Such approaches may seem harmless to someone not listening carefully, but they fail to glorify God, as they are neither Christ-centered nor biblically faithful.

Conclusion

Ultimately, discipleship must be firmly anchored in Scripture to glorify God. Any attempt to grow in sanctification apart from God's Word and Spirit leads to self-reliance and distorts the gospel. True discipleship and teaching should equip believers with sound doctrine and guide them into a deeper relationship with Christ, not lead to chasing after emotional highs or mystical experiences. True sanctification is God's work, accomplished by His grace, through the power of the Holy Spirit, for His glory.

[Notes below]

There's a notion that we cooperate with the grace of God. God does His part while we do ours. Our spiritual state and maturation depend on the work we put in, the spiritual disciplines we do. Ultimately, it's teaching us to discipline ourselves according to the flesh (Col 2), not in a God-honoring, Christ-centered, biblical way. It is not glorifying to God. It's divorcing sanctification from the grace of God and the transforming power of the Holy Spirit, and putting it primarily into our hands.

It's a lot of claiming things on the authority of Scripture that Scripture never actually says. There is no teaching of what the Bible says because none of the teaching is grounded in the Word of God. Experience and "Christian teaching" is relied upon above Scripture.

Phrases such as, "Westerners believe such and such but this is true instead" are used. This is very similar to the way progressive Christians utilize language. Positions different from their own are frequently mischaracterized. There is never any serious analysis of a text of Scripture. If you believe something different, well it wasn't very important anyway.

The idea is that Scripture is insufficient. We need more intimacy with God than we can get through Scripture, regular prayer, and fellowship. That's why we need spiritual disciplines. It's chasing after an experience or feeling. That's why it's esoteric, gnostic, and mystical. It's beyond facts, truths, propositions, and knowledge, so those things aren't very important anymore.

Theology should inform our prayer life and our discipleship. A Christian should want to be a disciple of Christ, but when you detach that from theology, you lead people astray. You aren't growing closer to God, growing spiritually, or glorifying God when you separate them. Being a biblically-grounded Christian gives us a foundation, reason and direction for being a disciple.

Contrast this with the teaching of Paul: "For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast" (Eph 2:8-9). "It was to show his righteousness at the present time, so that he might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus" (Rom 3:23).

"But now that you have been set free from sin and have become slaves of God, the fruit you get leads to sanctification and its end, eternal life" (Rom 6:22).

If you don't get sin right, you aren't talking about anything that's worthwhile.

The goal is to provide discipleship resources and guidance for Christians, but it is done without proper recourse to the Bible. That is completely unacceptable for a Christian.

These teachers tend to speak in a soft voice. It sounds good. Nobody is really thinking about what they are saying. But the teaching is presented in such a way that it doesn't sound concerning. Maybe it's given with a laugh, a smile, or you're told to write it down. And they read a verse with it too or at least loosely paraphrase one, so the assumption is that it must be biblical, never mind the fact that what they said was nowhere to be found in the verse.